LIST OF REFERENCES FOR CHAPTER 2
1.

European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. Report EUR 16260 (1996)

2.

European Guidelines for Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics. EUR 16261 (1996)

3.

Maccia C, Wall BF, Padovani R, Shrimpton PC, and Husson B. Results of a trial set up by a study group of the radiation protection programme of the CEC. In: Optimisation of image quality and patient exposure in diagnostic radiology. British Institute of Radiology Report 20, Edited by Moores BM, Wall BF, Eriskat H, and Schibilla H, pp 242-246 (London, BIR) (1989)

4.

Maccia C, Moores BM, and Wall BF. The 1991 trial on quality criteria for diagnostic radiogarphic images, detailed results and findings, Report EUR 16635 (1997)

5.

Vaño E, Oliete S, González L, Guibelalde E, Velasco A, and Fernández JM. Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial. British Journal of Radiology, 68, 1332-1335 (1995)

6.

Vaño E, Guibelalde E, Morillo A, Alvarez-Pedrosa CS, and Fernández JM. Evaluation of the European image quality criteria for chest examinations. British Journal of Radiology, 68, 1349-1355 (1995)

7.

Panzer W, Scheurer C, and Zankl M. Dose to patients in computed tomographic examinations: results and consequences from a field study in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Optimisation of image quality and patient exposure in diagnostic radiology. British Institute of Radiology Report 20, Edited by Moores BM, Wall BF, Eriskat H, and Schibilla H, pp 185-187 (London, BIR) (1989)

8.

Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, and Faulkner K. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2: Dosimetric aspects. Chilton, NRPB-R249 (London, HMSO) (1991)

9.

Jones DG and Shrimpton PC. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 3: Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. Chilton, NRPB-R250 (1991)

10.

Zankl M, Panzer W and Drexler G. The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part VI: Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91 (Neuherberg, Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung) (1991)

11.

Shrimpton PC and Wall BF. The increasing importance of x-ray computed tomography as a source of medical exposure. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 57 (1-4), 413-415 (1995)

12.

Unnik JG van, Broerse JJ, Geleijns J, Jansen JThM, Zoetelief J, Zweers D. Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals. British Journal of Radiology, 70, 367-371 (1997)

13.

Olerud HM. Analysis of factors influencing patient doses from CT in Norway. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 71, 123-133 (1997)

14.

Dalla Palma L and Pozzi-Mucelli RS. Image quality criteria for computed tomography. In: Optimisation of image quality and patient exposure in diagnostic radiology. British Institute of Radiology Report 20, Edited by Moores BM, Wall BF, Eriskat H and Schibilla H, pp 72-78 (London, BIR) (1989)

15.

Carvalho AF, Oliveira AD, Alves JG, Carreiro JV, Jensen LC and Jessen KA. Quality control in computed tomography performed in Portugal and Denmark. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 57 (1-4), 333-337 (1995)

16.

Olerud HM, Olsen JB and Skretting A. An anthropomorphic phantom for receiver operating characteristic studies in CT imaging of liver lesions. British Journal of Radiology, 72, 35-43 (1999)

17.

Albrechtsen J, Hansen J, Jensen LC, Jessen KA and Jurik AG. Quality control and image quality criteria in computed tomography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 57 (1-4), 125-127 (1995)

18.

Jurik AG, Jessen KA and Hansen J. Image quality and dose in computed tomography. European Radiology, 7, 77 - 81 (1997)

19.

Jurik AG, Fiirgaard B, Jensen JH, Jessen KA and Hansen J. Image quality criteria and patient dose in CT of the brain. British Journal of Radiology (to be published)

20.

Leitlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung in der Computertomographie. Dt. Ärztebl. 89: Heft 49 (1992) (English translation: Guidelines of the Federal Chamber of Physicians on quality assurrence in computed tomography. Internal Document CEC XII/354/92-EN)

21.

Jurik AG, Bongartz B, Golding SJ, Leonardi M. The quality criteria for computed tomography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 80, 49-53, (1998)

22.

Calzado A, Rodríguez R and Muñoz A. Quality criteria implementation for brain computed tomography examinations. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 80, 65-68 (1998)

23.

Shope TB, Gagne RM and Johnson GC. A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Medical Physics, 8 (4), 488-495 (1981)

24.

Shrimpton PC and Edyvean S. CT scanner dosimetry. British Journal of Radiology 71, 1-3 (1998)

25.

ICRP Publication 60, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of the ICRP Vol. 21 Nos. 1-3 (Pergamon Press, Oxford) (1991)

26.

AAPM. Specification and acceptance testing of computed tomography scanners. Report No 39 (New York, AAPM) (1993)

27.

Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Antonsen RG, Rueter FG, Slayton RJ and Suleiman OH. Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey. Radiology, 184, 135-140 (1992)

28.

Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR Part 1020: Diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components; amendments to performance standard; Final rule. Federal Register, 49, 171 (1984)

29.

Edyvean S, Lewis MA, Britten AJ, Carden JF, Howard GA and Sassi SA. Type testing of CT scanners: methods and methodology for assessing imaging performance and dosimetry. MDA Evaluation Report MDA/98/25. London, Medical Devices Agency (1998)

30.

International standard of IEC 60601-2-44: Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-44: Particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography (1999)

31.

IAEA. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources. International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Series No 115 Vienna, IAEA (1996)

32.

NRPB. Medical exposure: Guidance on the 1990 Recommendations of ICRP. Documents of the NRPB, 4, No 2, 43-74 (1993)

33.

Jurik AG, Petersen J, Bongartz, Golding SJ, Leonardi M, van Meerten PvE, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton P, Tosi G. Clinical use of image quality criteria in computed tomography related to radiation dose. A pilot study. European Radiology (to be submitted)